Monday, November 18, 2024

THEOLOGY OF WORSHIP PART 10: THE STRUCTURE OF WORSHIP—THE HISTORIC FOURFOLD ORDER (THE GOSPEL ORDER)

Audio for the following may be found here. You may also listen to podcast episodes here.

THE STRUCTURE OF WORSHIP—THE HISTORIC FOURFOLD ORDER (THE GOSPEL ORDER)

An important element to consider in especially the planning of worship is the threefold aspect of content, purpose, and style.[1] Through the order the church employs and the narrative told within such an order, the story of God should be told as a dialogue between God and his people. Through artistic elements and centered around the text of Scripture, leaders of worship have the responsibility of leading the church in honoring worship of the living triune God.

Content includes the material of the Christian worship gathering and the mode in which it is exercised. At a fundamental level, the content of worship is the story of God. The gospel must be proclaimed in Christian worship and not only echoed back to God but told between believers so as not to neglect the horizontal aspect of worship (not only vertical).

Moreover, the purpose of worship (broadly speaking) is the glory of God so all occurrences within the worship gathering should serve such a purpose. Filler material, often disguised as spiritual activities (e.g. prayer, speaking and teaching theological truths about congregational songs, etc.), should be erased from worship gatherings as they do not serve an intentional purpose.[2]

Content and purpose are nonnegotiable. Style is the only negotiable element of the three discussed here but only to an extent. Style is negotiable insofar as context and culture allows it to be. Leaders of worship should make every effort to ensure the enhancement and conductivity of God’s people to worship. If style impacts the ability of the local church to worship, stylistic elements should be reconsidered. Style is not about leaders’ (or congregants’) preferences. Style is merely a tool to worship God.

When content, purpose, and style are intentionally contemplated, the church’s worship is built upon a stable foundation. This chapter will examine all three elements with the aim of deliberate planning for leaders of worship.

Content

Of the three aspects that will be addressed here, two are nonnegotiable. That is they should not change no matter the circumstance or the context. Those two elements are content and purpose. What is meant by content is the materials that comprise the dialogue between God and his people. Surely, no local church should necessarily appear the same in their worship practices. Nonetheless, the content of Christian worship should hold commonality in every context.

The content of Christian worship should always revolve around the story of God. The story of God should be declared by God’s people as they thank him, honor him, and praise him through each element of the gathering (e.g. music, prayer, preaching, listening, reciting Scripture, etc.). Thus, foundationally, the content of worship should be the story of God.[3]

How the story of God is proclaimed among the people of God may certainly be disparate between contexts. The key, however, is to possess an intentional order by which to proclaim such a story. This text highly recommends the historic fourfold order.[4] That is the order historically employed by the church since the early church.

1)      Gathering

2)      Word

3)      Table

4)      Sending[5]

Even when other structures of worship are used, it is vital that local churches are intentional about what is said and declared during the corporate gathering. The fourfold order, however, holds historic roots for substantial reasons, which is subsequently why this text refers to the fourfold order as the gospel order.

The fourfold order, first, is intentional about not only broadcasting the story of God, it allows God’s people to live within the reality of that story through the mediation of Jesus Christ. Anecdotally, many local church contexts are not intentional about telling the story of God. When various free worship services are considered, it becomes clear that intentionality is often neglected. As an example, worshippers are often stunned when a portion of the congregational songs relate well to the message through the word, as if the Holy Spirit planned it that way, although the worship leaders did not. A perceptive mind would ask why that is shocking when it could happen every week if leaders of worship plan.

The fourfold order, secondly, tells the story not only of God but also his people. Like the history of God’s people, God gathers his people (Gathering), God speaks to his people (Word), God’s people respond in communion with him (Table), and God sends his people to serve and change the world (Sending).[6] Part of the story of God is his work within the lives of his people so it is essential to remember and declare how God has worked in his chosen people. In Psalms 25 and 26, the Israelites

walked around the altar, usually seven times, by which rite they “owned” the sacrifice, identifying it with themselves as the smoke of the sacrifice ascended to heaven. Worshipers praised and thanked God for the works of creation and providence and recounted the story of God’s saving acts toward Israel. Often the story of the election of the patriarchs, the deliverance of the children of Israel from Egypt, their trials in the wilderness, and their possession of the promised land was recounted.[7]

Thus, even God’s people in the Old Testament recounted God’s marvelous acts of mercy in their lives as an offering of worship. Remembrance is crucial in worship and not only remembrance but anamnesis or a participation and+ recollection through the way life is lived.

The fourfold order also realizes the authority of Scripture. The content of Christian worship is the story of God, which is evident in the text of Scripture. Therefore, God’s people must center everything that happens in the worship gathering around the Bible. Scripture declares the story of God because Scripture centers around Jesus. Where Scripture is not central to worship, a key element of content is missing so leaders of worship should be intentional about planning worship gatherings in a way that declares Scripture.[8]

Content in Christian worship is also a dialogue. Since worship is participatory, when God speaks, his people should respond. Worship leaders should seek ways for the church to respond together to the sacred beckoning of triune God during the gathering. Often, worship gatherings are seemingly disconnected (i.e. elements such as the songs sung, the prayers, and the messages seem to be disengaged from each other). As with the example of songs related to the sermon earlier, why should that not be a typical example each time the local church meets? When leaders of worship carefully plan each aspect (and not use elements as mere filling material), the dialogue is more conducive for God’s people to respond to him as he speaks.

Lastly, the content of worship is both trinitarian and christocentric, which is best exemplified through the fourfold order. The content of worship tells the story of God in its fullness (through Scripture) but also realizes the conciliation of Christ. Said another way, God works in a triune manner but mediates his work in the lives of his people through Jesus Christ. The content of worship should not neglect the Father, Son, or Holy Spirit but must simultaneously provide an opportunity for the church to live in the reality of Christ’s redeeming work, for without the redemption of Jesus Christ, the people of God have no capability to worship.

The content of worship is nonnegotiable in that no matter the context, God’s people should declare the story of God (not only declare the story of God but live within its reality). In its fullness, the story of God through Scripture must be told. The people of God should engage in the content of worship unwaveringly and with intent. Practically, the fourfold order delivers the best and most intentional way for the church to worship God through the content that is offered. Where content is compromised, a foundational element of Christian worship is absent. Thus, the efficacy of the gathering is risked. Content, therefore, should be traversed in a clear and precise manner, so as not to dilute the integrity of Lord’s Day worship.

Purpose

Another vital element of worship that is nonnegotiable is purpose. Ontological considerations of worship broadly include the glory of God (i.e. the church does what she does for the purpose of God’s glory). Worship could be summarized as the glory of God (i.e. anything that serves the glory of God is worship, and surely, everything in existence, without human distortion, is created for the governing purpose of glorifying God). Thus, in Christian worship, everything that happens should serve the purpose of glorifying God.

In a seminary, a wise professor once told me that the glory of God is always the issue. Such a simple statement put everything in a different perspective for me. To believe the truth that God’s glory is always the issue is to also believe that my comfort, my health, my financial standing, or even my family is never the issue. No matter how difficult circumstances become, the glory of God must always be the issue. Where this is forgotten, situations are misunderstood.

Moreover, since the purpose of worship is the glory of God, believers should understand that those who do not have a relationship with Jesus Christ do not have any capability to worship. Worship is designed only for Christians so when someone who is not a Christian is invited to the local church’s worship gathering, upon the notion that people either worship God or Satan, a worshipper of Satan has been invited into the weekly worship gathering of God’s people. To comprehend that the glory of God is always the issue is to place the gathering of God’s people at an elevated priority and never neglect the meeting of the local church.

The overarching purpose of God’s glory should shift how leaders plan the worship gathering. Without neglecting artistic creativity, no longer should God’s people seek aesthetic endeavors of worship that seem to exist for the purpose of entertainment. Artistic creativity is crucial in worship but never at the expense of God’s glory.

The purpose of worship is also transformation. The Apostle Paul instructs believers to be transformed by the renewing of the mind as their spiritual act of worship (Rom 12:1-2). If asked how one knows he or she has worshipped, the evidence is in change. If change has not occurred, one has not worshipped. In the Christian sanctification process, imperfection is expected. Nevertheless, the pattern of life should reveal one who has been and is being transformed.

Mark Labberton writes, “Two fault lines exist in the biblical narrative that both define the drama of God's relationship with Israel and shape God's relationship with the church today: the exodus and the exile.”[9] The exodus might be considered God’s concern for the injustice Israel suffers and exile (or Babylon) the injustice Israel has perpetrated.[10] Worship should change the lives of God’s people in such a way that what happens internally impacts external actions. In other words, God’s heart for the poor, lonely, and distraught is seen through the response of the church. Internal change cannot be evident by mere lip service but must instead be obvious in the actions of the local church. Transformation must occur in Christian worship. If one is not transformed, worship has not happened.

The purpose of worship is also communion with God and his people. While the vertical aspect of worship (that which occurs between God and individual Christians) often overshadows the horizontal aspect (that which occurs between God’s people with one another), the church should not neglect the communal element in worship. Most evident in the sacraments, the union Christians share with one another in Christ should be exemplified in the worship gathering. In telling the story of God, the church praises him for his marvelous acts but also recalls and declares the gospel to each other. Worship preaches the gospel by recounting God’s story, but worship also preaches the gospel from believer to believer. The songs the church sings, the scriptures the church reads, and indeed the prayers the church offers exist not only for the glory of God but, in a cyclic manner, the edification of the church. God’s covenant with his people is communal more than it is individual; the church comprises one unified body. There is, therefore, a communal aspect to worship that must not be forgotten or neglected.

Finally, the purpose of worship is prayer. Prayer is life; life is prayer; worship is prayer. Tim Keller defines prayer as not only a conversation with God but also an encounter.[11] As worship is a dialogue between God and his people, worship is a prayer encounter.[12] Jesus said, “…my house shall be called a house of prayer…” (Matt 21:13, Luke 19:46). Prayer then is a critical component to Christian worship. Often, however, prayer is seemingly one of the most neglected elements in worship, especially in free traditions.[13] Sadly, I have experienced worship gatherings where prayer is utilized as filler material for musical elements (e.g. key changes, capo changes for guitarists, etc.). Every element of worship should hold an intentional purpose or be scrubbed if it does not. Prayer is vital to Christian worship and should be exercised with intent and veracity since it is the source of power for God’s people. The prayers of the righteous have great power (Jas 5:16). God’s people, therefore, should be a people of prayer. Worship should be an all-encompassing act of prayer.

The purpose of worship includes the glory of God, transformation, communion with God and his people, and prayer. These ingredients are fixed and nonconvertible. Thus, once purpose is established and content is derived from such a purpose, the story of God may be told unfalteringly by God’s people in a participatory manner and in a way that joins in an encounter with God for the people of God.

Style

The third factor regarding the structure of worship is style. Both content and purpose are nonnegotiable. Style, to an extent, is negotiable. What is meant by its negotiability is that style is important depending on variables. Style is not an aspect of worship that is stable but varies depending on a multitude of moveable items. Style is contextual, cultural, elicits the best of what God’s people offer, and yet present an unchanging message irrespective of its approach. Thus, style is negotiable to an extent. Nonetheless, a plurality of variables must be considered.

First, style is contextual. Contextual style includes but is not limited to music, language and lingo, mode of presentation, technology, and even method of communication. For example, the most obvious difference in stylistic approach is music. A church comprised primarily of young adults and families will likely employ vastly different music each Lord’s Day than a local church that includes primarily elderly people. Additionally, the use of technology will likely be different in such contexts. Even the language and method of communication might be different.

Stylistic difference is not attributed only to age. A pastor in a small church with a setting in the country will likely communicate differently than a large church in a city with a large portion of its members being seminarians. Language and forms of communication are perpetually changing, and the church has adapted throughout its history to meet her members in a way that is conducive to their understanding and ability to worship (e.g. Martin Luther’s translation of the Bible into the vernacular for his parishioners to read and understand the text in their own language rather than Latin). As figure 10.1 reveals, during the Enlightenment period, conceptual language was the primary form of communication in the church, while Post-Enlightenment years saw the use of symbolic language.[14]

Figure 10.1 Enlightenment and Post-Enlightenment forms of communication in Christian worship

 

In Christian worship, each device utilized must be scrutinized to ensure the effectiveness of local church worship so to an extent, style is also nonnegotiable. Although style is not something that impacts substance in worship, the efficacy could certainly be impacted. God’s people are diverse and from every tribe, tongue, and nation so contexts differ. The Apostle Paul attests, “…I have made myself a servant to all…” (1 Cor 1:19). The minister of God is to do the same in his or her context with regard to style.

Style is, secondly, cultural. Foreign missionaries understand this truth immensely. One should not enter a foreign culture with the purpose of sharing the gospel and continue to do so in a way that is only relevant to his or her home culture. Rather, to reach the people to whom they have been called, they would adapt to the culture in which they now reside and minister. On a more localized scale, the same should be true of local church leaders. Leaders of worship should adapt to the culture to which they have been called.

Local churches exist within subcultures. There are small churches, large churches, churches with money, poor churches, churches in college cities, churches in suburban areas, churches with young families, churches with a primarily elderly population, etc. These factors should be considered when planning Lord’s Day worship. Stylistic elements such as music, technology, and language are not the chief goals of worship (although often they become such) but are important in fostering an environment favorable to God’s people offering their best to God. In this way, style is negotiable only apart from context and culture.

Ministers of God are called to people, not locations. Without people, locations would not matter. Thus, effective leadership requires a survey of the cultural and contextual climate. Upon such an examination, the minister of God is surely better equipped with the necessary tools to minister to the people to whom he has been called. Context and culture then must not be neglected.

Thirdly, style should elicit the best of God’s people, not the desires of their leaders. For leaders of worship, it might be tempting (especially as artists) to seek stylistic choices that suit his or her artistic desires. Still, what works efficiently in one context might not prove auspicious in another. The goal is not the aesthetic desires of local church leaders but rather the best worship of God’s people. Local church leaders should be mature enough to understand the difference and transcend their own desires for the elicitation of worship among God’s people in their context to which they have been called. Ministry is employed for God’s people rather than the benefit of ministers themselves and is done with no thought of return. If stylistic elements do not aid in the worship of God’s people, they should be scrapped or changed.

Finally, in discussions of style, local churches should be mindful of the message, which should not change irrespective of stylistic choices. The message is the gospel; the message is the story of God; the message is God’s work in and among his people; and the message must not change. Otherwise, the church has missed the point of worship.

Style is important contextually and culturally. Nonetheless, style should not override content and purpose. Leaders of worship should not avoid the importance of style but should adapt where necessary and seek to ameliorate the worship of God’s people to whom they have been called. To an extent, style is the only negotiable element mentioned in this text. On a cultural and contextual basis, however, style is vital to eliciting the worship of local churches and should be carefully scrutinized so that right decisions are made.

The Full Counsel Call

Paul declares, “For I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27). Christian worship is designed to withhold nothing from the people of God insofar as such is told in his word. The full counsel may only be accomplished if content and purpose are not compromised. Additionally, style, although broadly negotiable, must be carefully considered depending on context and culture; yet, the message (the gospel story of God) must remain unchanged. Leaders of worship have been given a call to declare the full counsel of God. Through the narrative of Scripture and the story of God in such, the church may stand unified in declaring God’s story and unfalteringly proclaiming its truth.

Worship tells the story of God, and its structure is designed for the people of God alone, for only the redeemed of God hold any possibility of worshiping him. Whatever order local churches employ, it should be intentional. This text submits that the fourfold order is the best order to tell the gospel story of God. Content, purpose, and style then comprise the structure of worship, and the fourfold order intentionally declares the story of God in a connected dialogue between God and his people. Content, purpose, and style consider and are predicated on the call to declaring the full counsel and vastly important to Christian worship.


[1] In his book, Planning Blended Worship, Robert Webber includes structure, but this text considers the three mentioned here as an overarching part of structure.

[2] That is not to say that those elements cannot exist but rather that leaders of worship should be careful that every word and action employed in the gathering subsists for the sole purpose of worship.

[3] It is recommended here that the content of the Christian worship gathering is a succinct and clear story of God (i.e. each element of the worship gathering should reveal a clear pattern and, perhaps, theme designed around declaring who God is and his work in the lives of his people).

[4] Webber, Planning Blended Worship (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1998), 20.

[5] Webber, Planning Blended Worship, 21.

Admittedly, the fourfold order is not the only order of worship that may be utilized. The fourfold order, however, it perhaps the best and most intentional way of declaring the full counsel of God in Christian worship.

[6] The Sending might be seen as the connection between corporate and private worship, as God’s people are sent to serve.

Other orders subsist that may certainly tell the story of God and his people (e.g. God, Man, Christ, Response), but the fourfold order, used by the church for centuries, is likely the best way to do so.

[7] Oliphant, Worship, Reformed According to Scripture, 35.

[8] A sure way to do this is by utilizing a lectionary, which declares the full counsel of God through Scripture, as the entire Bible is heard on a rotating basis.

[9] Mark Labberton, The Dangerous Act of Worship: Living God’s Call to Justice (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2007), loc. 1489-1490.

[10] Labberton, The Dangerous Act of Worship, loc. 1490.

[11] Keller, Prayer, 45.

[12] The Eucharist is often referred to as The Great Thanksgiving, for the entire sacrament acts as a prayer to the Father.

[13] Liturgical traditions usually include intentional prayers built into the worship gathering since prayer books and lectionaries are utilized.

[14] Webber, Planning Blended Worship, 27.