Audio for the following may be found here. You may also listen to podcast episodes here.
CAN A CHRISTIAN BE A SOCIALIST?
Socialism and its
far-reaching and seemingly unceasing grasp have seen drastic rises in Western
culture—especially in the United States of America. Recent data reveals
surprising (and troubling to many) increases in socialist support in the United
States. Nearly half (46% to 49%) of 18- to 34-year-olds view democratic
socialism positively. Separate data from organizations like the Cato Institute
indicate that up to 62% of young people aged 18 to 29 hold favorable views of
socialism. Within the Democratic party, support of socialism is up from 50% to
about 66%. While most Americans tend to favor capitalism over socialism, the
numbers continue to fall for the former and rise for the latter.[1]
In the United States (at least), however, socialism is often masked with the title of democratic socialism—possibly a feeble attempt to separate the title from communism. The aim of both, however, is the same: to federalize the means of production and private business. With the recent elections of boldly-admitted socialists (e.g., Florida Democrat Angie Nixon, Colorado’s Melat Kiros, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, NY’s Darializa Avila-Chevalier, and massive wins by Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) candidates in Michigan and Pennsylvania, the issue is more than a mere passing phase. It is crucial that Americans consider all facets of socialism and (for the church) especially what it means for Christians.
Socialism
Defined
In its simplest and purest form, socialism is an economic and political system where the community or the government owns and controls the major means of production, distribution, and exchange of goods.[2] While various forms (and levels) of socialism subsist, the goal and end is the same—the government controls the economic force of society rather than private citizens. Historically-socialist nations are certainly no secret (e.g., the former Soviet Union, China, Cuba, etc.), many of which still operate under such ideals presently.
Is
It Biblical? Is It Right?
In determining if it is possible to be a Christian and subscribe to socialism, one must first decipher if socialism is biblical[3] and, further, if socialism is morally right. One must consider not only whether socialism exists in the Bible but whether it is also suggested as moral and good for God’s people and for society. In seeking such answers, it is appropriate to examine the Bible for indications of socialism (including the teachings of Jesus) and measure such indicators against current Christian proposals of socialism.
Christian Interpretations of Socialism
Christian undertones of
socialism certainly exist within the framework of the modern church—especially
that of Western influence. Contentions for compatibility between Christianity
and socialism lie in early church practices, a heavy focus on the poor and
needy in Scripture, and a general rejection of greed.
As a matter of early
church practice, those who advocate for socialism from a Christian perspective
pose that the New Testament describes early believers sharing their money and
goods to help the poor. Additionally, Jesus did, in fact, teach his followers
to feed the hungry, care for the sick, and help those in need (truly a
characteristic of God that is not new to New Covenant teachings, as it is also
revealed in Micah 6:8 to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with God). Furthermore,
Christian socialism argues that extreme wealth and unbridled capitalism promote
selfishness and hurt the vulnerable.
But are they truly
“Christian”?
These so-called
Christian interpretations of socialism are seemingly heard often with the rise
of democratic socialism’s perpetuation. At face value, New Testament practices
of helping those in need, Jesus’ teachings of caring for such people, and an
unbridled rejection of greed and selfishness are elements with which few may
contend, for they are right and good. The previous assertions are (at least
anecdotally) the most common supports for socialism from a Christian platform.
Nevertheless, such affirmations find voids in their foundations.
First, Jesus’ teachings
are never directed toward government but rather his followers (i.e.,
Christians—the church). Although disobedience to God regarding loving the least
of these (Matt 25:40) is sin, Jesus’ instruction is not to legislate morality.
If people do not choose to honor God with their actions, they cannot be forced
to do so. Morality should not be legislated but rather chosen.[4]
Jesus’ instructions of generosity and hospitality are directed toward his own
people rather that the magistrates.
Second, opponents of
socialism note that the Bible respects personal property rights (such as the
commandment not to steal) and ties individual work directly to survival.
Support of private ownership and property is replete in the Bible and should
not be dismissed. Moreover, when a government controls the means of private
property, society fails to acquire that which might be given in generosity to
people who need it.[5]
Third, traditional Marxist socialism historically promotes a materialistic or atheistic worldview, viewing organized religion as a tool of oppression. People under the age of thirty-five have no memory of the Soviet Union. The Berlin Wall fell thirty-seven years ago. People of such youth do not know the lengths people went to escape the Soviet Bloc and other Communist so-called paradises. They have not read Alexander Solzenitsyn’s books about the gulags or seen Soviet leader Kruschev pound his shoe and proclaim his intention to bury the West. At face value, socialism seems to be the utopia it promises while those who have memory of and have experienced it have also experienced its lies. Without delving much into Marxist thought (as it is not in the scope of this paper), it should be sufficiently comprehended that Marxism is incompatible with the teachings of Jesus and, thus, with Christianity.
Was
Jesus a Socialist?
A common notion often
submitted in support of socialism is that Jesus was a socialist. Those who
advocate for socialism seem to think “it is a nicer, more inclusive system than
capitalism and see a quest for justice congruent with Jesus’ ministry and his
concern for the poor, dispossessed, and downtrodden. It is true that Jesus was
concerned about these people and acted on it, but there are some essential
distinctions.”[6]
First, the Bible never
charges the government with caring for the poor or benevolence, except that a
nation is identified as God’s people (i.e., Israel), in which case much disdain
would subsist for the aim of a theocracy. Rather, such a charge is given to the
people of God alone.
Second, the foundation
of the market system is enshrined in the commands God gave the Israelites in
the Torah. There is not much to the market system, what Marx called capitalism.
All that is needed is private property and voluntary exchange. If people can
own stuff (land, buildings, animals, equipment, but also ideas and labor) and
can exchange those things as they see fit, that is capitalism, and it naturally
emerges. It does not have to be imposed, but it must be protected.[7]
At its core, without
understanding, socialism must be imposed rather than chosen, and if it is
chosen, a lack of comprehension is present. American writer, Ayn Rand (who was
born herself under the pressures of Communism in the Soviet Union), states that
communism and socialism are identical in their ultimate goal and results,
differing only in their methods: communism uses direct physical force, while
socialism uses the democratic process of voting. She famously wrote that it is “merely
the difference between murder and suicide.”[8]
The disparity between Jesus’ teachings and pure socialism then is coercion (socialism) and choice (capitalism). Coercion is not the way of God, the way of Jesus, or the way of the cross.[9] Christians who pose ideals of socialism, therefore, offer misapplied scriptures and misinterpreted teachings of Jesus.[10]
Drawing
from Dylan Pahman, PhD
Dylan Pahman, PhD and
President of the St. Nicholas Cabasilas Institute for Orthodoxy and Liberty,
recently published an article criticizing Christian socialism in which he uses
a comparative analysis of two prominent historical figures to explore whether
devotion to Christ and socialism can truly coexist: Semyon Frank (a
twentieth-century Russian religious philosopher who offered poignant critiques
of socialist proposals, warning Christians against utopian errors and state
overreach) and F.D. Maurice (a nineteenth- century Russian philosopher who argued that the holiness of private
property is derived from our divine obligation to use what we own to care for
our neighbors).
Pahman aligns with Frank
to argue that secular and political socialist movements often default to
utopian fallacies, overestimating the state’s capacity to engineer a perfect
society, but he also asserts that to fulfill the Christian mandate of charity,
society requires more economic freedom, not less. Charitable and
entrepreneurial initiatives rely directly on the freedom of the individual to
act voluntarily. Drawing from Maurice’s model, Pahman concludes that true
social transformation should be led by the church and voluntary communities
rather than state bureaucracies. Social responsibility should be driven by a
shared spiritual vision where individuals care for the least of these within
their personal vocations.
The seemingly most-common consensus among conservative evangelical Christians is that charity should be offered from individuals rather than government. Moreover, many American citizens have observed massive waste an incompetence in government entities, which leads many to conclude that government is the absolute worst unit to oversee charity.
Has
Socialism Ever Worked?
Advocates for socialism
often seem to argue with examples of nations where socialism has supposedly
worked or is currently working (e.g., China, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway). Upon
closer examination of such nations, however, it becomes clear that socialism is
not what has made them successful.
China, for example, has
allowed market reforms and private property while maintaining heavy state
control over key industries, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty,
though operating more as a state-directed market economy than traditional
socialism so China has not been a purely socialist country for several decades.
The Nordic model is often
cited as successful socialism, but their leaders clarify they are free-market
capitalist economies where they utilize private enterprise and competitive
markets alongside high taxes, strong labor unions, and robust public welfare
safety nets so (again) this is not pure socialism.
Even post-WW2 Great
Britain democratically nationalized major industries like rail, coal, and
healthcare (creating the National Health Service or NHS), but many of these
sectors faced later economic friction and were heavily privatized in subsequent
decades.
Nations that claim
socialism seem to boast success in many cases, but when examined more closely,
it becomes apparent that 1) they are far from pure socialism and 2) what has
most significantly aided in their seeming success are capitalist (rather than socialist)
ideals. To answer the question of whether socialism has ever worked then, the
answer seems to be a resounding no.
Four
Concluding Matters
For concluding matters,
I offer four elements to consider bearing in mind the issues, thoughts, and
assertions presented here. First, Jesus calls the church to trust him. The
answer to the world’s problems will never be found in a government or
magistrate but only in the hope that exists in Jesus Christ. When kings and
kingdoms fail (and ultimately, they will) and dissolve into the unknown, the
reign of Jesus will be forever. His people are called to trust him for
provision, as he supplies everything needed not only for godliness but also for
life (2 Pet 1:3).
Second, Jesus calls the
church to generosity and hospitality (especially toward the poor and needy) and
a rejection of greed without excuse. A rejection of socialism on grounds of the
church’s responsibility to charity should not negate such a charge but rather
enhance it. One who professes Christ and does not live in generosity and
charity lives in sin. Research reveals that Christians (especially American
Christians) are among the most generous people in society.[11]
Perhaps, such data discloses a deeper spiritual reality that God’s people are
givers because God is a giver.
Third, Jesus demands
respect for authority (Rom 13). The implicit response of believers to this
truth should be that even if the government mandates socialist policies, while
Christians may surely disagree, God has placed governmental leaders in
positions of authority so if laws and regulations do not impose
morally-bankrupt actions, God’s people are to respect such orders and, yes,
while still be charitable.
Last, Jesus never
suggests government-mandated charity. God’s commands for charity are aimed
toward his own people so the responsibility of charity rests solely on the
church. The answer to the earlier pontification of Jesus’ position as a
socialist should be clear from this paper: Jesus was not and is not a
socialist, as his instructions do not infer governmental responsibility to
charity.
Scripture does give
government a great task, but it is protection rather than a particular economic
ideal. As such, it is the conclusion of this paper that socialism is largely
incompatible with Christian values.[12]
Lord,
I would be the most miserable person in the world if my hopes were only in this
life. Why? Because I am hopeless without Christ’s righteousness. My life could
never be comfortable, and there would be no hope at all of eternal life.
If
you denied me that hope, I would be the most miserable one of all. I may be
happy without worldly enjoyments, but all things in the world cannot make me
happy without this.
So
however you treat me in this world, whatever you deny me, Lord, deny me not
this. I can be happy without riches and abundance, like Job and Lazarus were. I
can be happy even if I am reviled and reproached, as was Christ and his
disciples. I can be happy and comfortable in prison, as were Paul and Silas.
But
I cannot be happy without the righteousness of Christ.[13]
[1]
Lydia Saad, “How Americans View Capitalism, Socialism, and Free Enterprise,” Gallup,
August 6, 2026, https://news.gallup.com/poll/713144/americans-view-capitalism-socialism-free-enterprise.aspx.
[2]
Kristian Niemietz, Socialism: The Failed Idea That Never Dies (London:
Institute of Economic Affairs, 2019).
The DSA (Democratic Socialists
of America) attempt to cover the pure meaning of socialism by presenting it as
disparate in that democratic socialism is democratically (by vote) chosen by
the people rather than forced upon society through dictatorship. Nonetheless,
no matter how socialism is employed, the same goal is achieved: namely government
control of the means of production.
[3]
“Biblical” here should be understood as synonymous with God’s morally-right way
as indicated in the text of Scripture.
[4] As
such, it is the view of this paper that legislation should only exist to
protect people’s rights and well-being. Thus, if laws are created with morality
at the forefront (though there is surely room for debate and disagreement), the
action is an exercise in futility.
[5] It
is conversely true that those who profess Christ but fail to exercise
generosity live in sin.
[6]
Brian Baugus, “Jesusand Socalism: What Does the Bible Say?” (blog), Regent
University, January 19, 2026, https://ccta.regent.edu/jesus-and-socialism-what-does-the-bible-say/.
[7]
Baugus.
[8]
Ayn Rand, For the New Intellectual (NY, NY: New American Library Penguin
Group, 1961), 43.
[9]
This statement is compatible with the doctrines of sovereign grace since such
concepts include humankind’s choice (not free will). While salvation is passive
(to people), believers still have daily choices for which, although
motively-controlled by God, they are still held accountable.
[10] Anecdotally, it might also be observed
that many proponents of so-called Christian socialism do not practice orthodox
Christianity and are otherwise opposed to such.
[11] Philanthropy
Roundtable, s.v. “Less God, Less Giving?” accessed August 25, 2026, https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/magazine/less-god-less-giving/.
[12]
The implication here does not suggest an impossibility of Christian socialism
but rather a difficulty. While socialism is not evil in and of itself, the
Bible most supports capitalist ideas and rejects traditional Marxist and
socialist concepts.
[13] David Clarkson, “No Hope without Christ’s Righteousness,” in Piercing Heaven: Prayers of the Puritans, ed. Robert Elmer (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2019), 18.
