Saturday, August 24, 2024

AS TO THE LORD PART 3: THE SERVANT LEADERSHIP OF HUSBANDS (EPHESIANS 5:25-33)

 Audio for the following may be found here. You may also listen to podcast episodes here.

AS TO THE LORD: THE SERVANT LEADERSHIP OF HUSBANDS (EPHESIANS 5:25-33)

In the second part of this series on marriage, Paul’s address to husbands will be examined. Appropriately, as the head of the family, husbands are devoted a greater portion of the text since certainly, the husband holds a greater level of accountability. Paul’s instructions here point to the husband’s role as a leader but as a leader who imitates Christ and, thus, leads through serving, for this is how Christ led his people in his earthly ministry.

Paul’s instructions are explicit: the husband is to love his wife as Christ loves the church. The implicit idea is that Christ gave all for his bride and left nothing in doing so: he gave his life. The husband’s leadership is imperative to any successful marriage. As such, the husband should carefully consider what it means to 1) submit to God and 2) lead his family through serving as Christ has modeled. Paul submits that marriage is a mystery, for the union portrays Christ and the church. The husband then should seek to imitate Christ in how he handles his marriage. In Ephesians 5:25-33, three conclusions may be drawn from the text that revolve around the husband’s role as a servant leader.

1.      Christ is the ultimate model for husbands;

2.      as the church is one with Christ, the wife is one with her husband; and

3.      the mystery of marriage is led by the husband.

These truths resonate in a godly marriage, which is precisely that for which husbands should strive.

 

Christ Is the Ultimate Model for Husbands (5:25-57)

Godly family dynamics are based upon mutual submission in the body of Christ. All parties of the family hold particular responsibilities so Paul circles around to the husbands and not surprisingly devotes more text to husbands than wives since the husband is emphasized as the head of the family (Eph 5:23). In a similar manner to Paul’s instructions to the wife, he offers Christ as the model for godly husbands. The crucial element in submission to anyone is submission to Christ. “The chief threat in submitting to another person is the fear of being manipulated or mistreated by that person. There is no such cause for fear with Christ; his is tender guidance, not raw authority.”[1] Such is the underlying reason submission to one another is subsequent to submission to Christ.

Paul focuses primarily on the role of husbands in loving their wives out of obedience to Christ. Without excuse, the husband is charged to love his wife as Christ has loved the church. There subsists no shortage of implications in such a command, for Christ spared nothing in loving the church, even offering his life as a sacrifice on her behalf while she rejected him (Rom 5:8). “[John] Chrysostom [(c. 347 – 407 AD)] puts it, ‘Hast thou seen the measure of obedience? Hear also the measure of love. Wouldst thou that thy wife should obey thee as the church doth Christ? Have care thyself for her, as Christ for the church.’”[2] Said another way, if the husband desires the wife’s godly submission, he must first submit wholly to Christ, for such is the scale by which the husband’s love should be determined.

A significant implication of the husband’s responsibility to love his wife as Christ loves the church is the negation of reciprocation (i.e. whether the wife responds to the husband in the same love and submission, the husband’s obligation to love his wife is not withdrawn under any circumstances, for Christ loves his bride no matter her obedience or disobedience). In a culture where concepts of love are often derived from popular entertainment, love is falsely seen as something that happens without work. Love, however, requires cultivation and intentional decisions (i.e. one loves because he or she makes a conscious effort to love; thus, it does not simply happen without trying). Such is certainly true in relationships that have had time to develop. When the honeymoon is finished, husbands and wives must cultivate their own love for each other and perpetually decide to love each other irrespective of what the other gives in return, for such love is what Christ demands of his people.

Paul extends an analogy to his readers in discussing Christ’s act of sanctifying his bride (Eph 5:26) and presenting her blameless (Eph 5:27). The Apostle’s analogy, however, does not suggest that the husband is capable of sanctifying his wife but rather that the husband is to love his wife in such a way that he serves her and seeks the best for her. A parallel may be drawn with how a bride prepares for her wedding. She desires to be seen as beautiful and without blemish. To Jesus, however, his bride may not be seen any more beautiful, for he has removed the stain of sin. The crucial element then is that Christ has done the work, not his bride.[3] In the same way, the husband is to serve his wife so that his acts ameliorate his bride’s life and standing. As Christ loved the church and gave himself for her, husbands are to do the same for their wives, which is a Christ-like servant leadership.

Husbands are to love wives as Christ loves the church, implying the most extreme measures of love that could ever exist. The example Christ sets is leadership through service. Submission, therefore, stems from all believers’ submission to Christ and then to each other and then from wives to husbands. If the husband submits first to Christ, his love for his wife will exceed human measure, for he will love his wife not because of what she does for him but irrespective of it. The husband will serve his wife and seek the best for her. Then the wife may submit without concern that her submission will impact her negatively. Husbands are to lead their wives through servant leadership, of which Christ is the ultimate model.

 

 

 

As the Church Is One with Christ, the Wife Is One with Her Husband (5:28-31)

The mystery of Paul’s words continues in his metaphors to the Church at Ephesus when he discusses husbands and wives as a body. The church exists as one body. Scripture, however, makes clear that the husband and wife also become one flesh (Gen 2:24). Therefore, as Christ and his people are one the husband and wife are also one. In a selfless act, husbands are to love their wives as their own bodies (Eph 5:28). While Paul’s argument is rooted in an action as to the Lord, here “he urges the husbands on the basis of something inferior, namely, their own body, not only from the superior, that is, their Lord.”[4] Analogizing one’s own body is perhaps more relatable to the common person so Paul takes such an approach in qualifying the husband’s responsibility to his wife.

The Apostle Paul contends that the husband should love his wife as Christ loves the church because, as Christ and his church are one, the husband is one with his wife through the divine union to which each party has committed. When the husband loves his wife, therefore, he loves his own body. An extreme scenario is then portrayed when the image is given of one hating his own body (Eph 5:29). Any sane person would not hate his own body but “nourishes and cherishes it” (Eph 5:29). Such is the same action Jesus takes toward his bride, the church. Thus, husbands are to love their wives as their own bodies, for the two are one.

One might argue that loving oneself is an act of selfishness and conceit. The use of the word, ἀγαπάω (agapao), however proves this is not the case. “A man should seek his own highest spiritual welfare, and so the highest good of his wife in every way, as united with himself in the marriage bond. His wife is not a person lower in social status, much less one over whom he has rights of ownership, but a part of himself.”[5] To love one’s wife as his own body is to love himself in the most unselfish manner. Moreover, to do so is to first love Christ, for Jesus is the ultimate model of such selfless love. If the husband submits first to Christ and then obeys his Lord by loving his wife, he is also loving himself but in a selfless rather than selfish way, for he is loving the one flesh he has made with his wife. This type of obedience holds its rhizomes in Christ’s ultimate model of love.

Paul’s words to the Ephesians here do not advance a new concept, for God has designed marriage to operate in this way since the beginnings of humanity (Gen 2:24). Paul, therefore, references the beginnings of marriage by quoting the Genesis text. Jewish culture would have certainly been familiar with the notion of a husband and wife becoming one so it was perhaps more relatable than the idea of leading through service. Servant leadership, much as it is today, runs against the currents of society. Leadership seems to often be linked to being served rather than serving. Jesus, however, flipped that model upside down and revealed leadership through service to others. Further, Jesus’ leadership was through serving his own bride by giving his life for her. The husband is to love his wife in such a way that his leadership extends from service. This is how Christ loves the church and how husbands are to love their wives.

Paul’s instructions center around the mystery of marriage and what it represents. It is taken with such seriousness that “it has been the ultimate bulwark of the church against the arguments for allowing polygamy to remain in the societies where she has met it; it is the ultimate argument against promiscuity; it is the ultimate reason why the church can have no pleasure in the dissolution of marriage by divorce.”[6] Even when approached about divorce, Jesus directed his response to God’s plan from the beginning (Matt 19:3-9, Mark 10:2-12). “Divorce may be allowed, but it is a decline from the divine purpose, and it can never be seen in any other light. The Lord gave no new teaching on the matter but directed his appeal back to this verse.”[7] For a marriage to exemplify Christ and his bride, the church, the husband must realize his own responsibility, for as the head, he is to love his wife as his own body, as Christ loves the church, and as unto the Lord.

When the perspective on obedience is that all decisions and actions proceed from obedience to the Lord, circumstances change dramatically. The pains and toils of marriage are misunderstood and magnified when marriage is seen as merely a benefit to oneself. The husband is to love his wife with no thought of return and without the expectation of reciprocation, for this is how Christ loves the church. As the ultimate model then, husbands are to love their wives in the same way. As the head, the husband is to lead his body (his wife) through service to her. Christ led through service. Therefore, the husband is to do the same, for he is one with his wife. Imitating Christ produces the husband’s servant leadership and exceeding love toward his bride.

 

The Mystery of Marriage Is Led by the Husband (5:32-33)

Jesus Christ took the world’s idea of leadership and flipped it on its head (i.e. God’s eternal kingdom does not match the world’s economy). In God’s frame of work, the first are last and the last first (Matt 20:16), he who loses his life finds it (Matt 16:25), and indeed, the goal is to serve rather than to be served (Matt 20:28, Mark 10:45). In the God-ordained order, the husband is the head and leader of the family. The husband’s role as leader, however, is to lead through service, for serving others is how Jesus Christ modeled leadership during his ministry on earth, and husbands are indeed to imitate Christ, a charge Paul gives just mere verses before discussing marriage (Eph 5:1). For the mystery of marriage (a picture of Christ and the church) to be exemplified accurately, the husband must lead in the manner of Christ: through service.

Paul offers the crux of his argument in verse 33 by saying that husbands should love wives as themselves and that wives should respect their husbands. Love and respect simplify the portrait of Christian marriage. When the husband loves the wife as Christ loves the church, he selflessly serves her and intentionally seeks her best interest; when the wife respects her husband, she follows his leadership; and indeed, when both the husband and wife submit to God first, they then mutually submit to one another in love. This is the ultimate picture of a godly and good marriage: love and respect.

Furthermore, the dynamics of such a marriage are led by the husband. The Apostle Paul suggests marriage to be a mystery since it alludes to Christ and the church. The word used for mystery is μυστήριον (mysterion). The word is derived from the root, muo, which means “to shut the mouth.”[8]This word we have seen used for the great eternal secret of God’s purpose for mankind, hidden in the past but now revealed in Christ.”[9] The implication is something secretive or confined only to the initiated. The church is the initiated: the bride of Christ. The marriage union between Jesus and his bride is the most realistic marriage (i.e. Christ and the church is not a picture of human marriage; human marriage is a picture of Christ and the church). Thus, the mystery is dimly revealed to a watching world through Christian marriage. Additionally, in the same way, the husband’s leadership should illustrate that of Jesus Christ. Said another way, without the husband’s servant leadership, the mystery of marriage remains a secret, for the display is not that of Christ and the church.

While the mystery of marriage certainly includes wives, Paul’s focus for much of this text is the role of the husband. Ultimately, in failures of the family, the husband will be held accountable to a greater degree than the wife.[10] As such, the wife should respect the husband’s position and role and submit to his leadership, especially if such a man submits first to God and makes decisions that are not incompatible to Scripture. A man who offers decisions incompatible to God’s will should be overridden by the wife’s submission to God. If the husband, however, seeks God’s will and makes decisions upon the guidance of the Holy Spirit, even if the wife finds such decisions to violate her own desires, her task is to submit to his leadership, for his submission to the Lord overrides any desires of the flesh. Moreover, it is the husband who will be held accountable in his leadership of his family.

Paul’s words do not exclude either the husband or the wife but offer a greater liability to the husband. The mystery of marriage is profound in many respects. It is vital that Christian marriage do what God intended: namely portray Jesus Christ and his bride, the church. While the husband and wife each have precise roles to fulfill in such a display, the mystery is led by the husband. Therefore, whatever picture is portrayed through the marriage (either Christ and the church or the selfishness of fleshly desires), the husband’s remit is of utmost importance. His leadership, however, is not one of overbearing demands but of service to his wife, for serving is how Jesus Christ modeled leadership in his ministry on earth. Servant leadership is not weakness nor apathy but strength and humility. This is how the husband is to lead in displaying the mystery of marriage, for doing so is to lead as unto the Lord.

 

No Greater Love: Christ, the Ultimate Model of a Loving Husband

[In an article for Decision magazine], Samuel Kamaleson illustrates [the difficulty of submission] through a Christian folk story from South India… It opens with a young boy who loved to play marbles… His special blue marble… had won him many matches. During one walk he encountered a young girl who was eating a bag of chocolate candy… He thought to himself, “I have got to get my hands on those chocolates.” The boy proceeds to convince the girl to trade all her candy for all the marbles. He put his hand in his pocket, searching for the distinguishing cracks on the surface of the blue marble…[and] carefully pushed it to the bottom of his pocket. Having traded her all but his lucky marbles, he thought his plan was a success and turned to walk away. As he began to eat the candy, he suddenly turned to the girl and asked, “Hey, did you give me all the chocolates?” [You see,] our fallen nature persuades us to posture ourselves in the same deceptive and defiant attitude as the boy in this story. We want everything the kingdom of God has to offer… but we are unwilling to give up everything for it. Many times, there is a blue marble in our lives that we seem unwilling to offer to the control of Christ.[11]

Christ is the most superior example of love. He left nothing remaining in loving his bride. In the same way, Christian husbands should serve their wives in a selfless and sacrificial manner. As the role of the wife presupposes the husband’s submission to God, the husband’s role also presupposes the wife’s submission to God. Nonetheless, irrespective of reciprocation or benefit, the husband is called to love his wife as Christ loves the church, which means a sacrificial love even upon rejection, for such is how Christ loves his people. To do so, the husband cannot continue to lay claim to his blue marbles but must submit to God by offering himself as a servant to his wife. This is Christlike; this is leadership; this is loving the wife as to the Lord.




[1] Richard J. Erickson, “Ephesians,” in Evangelical Commentary on the Bible, vol. 3, Baker Reference Library (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1995), 1031.

[2] Francis Foulkes, Ephesians: An Introduction and Commentary, vol. 10, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1989), 162.

[3] Ibid., 164.

[4] M.J. Edwards, ed., Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999), 197.

[5] Foulkes, 165.

[6] Ibid., 166.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Blue Letter Bible, Mysterion, https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g3466/esv/mgnt/0-1/.

[9] Foulkes, 167.

[10][10] This is not to suggest that the wife holds no responsibility but that the husband’s position as the head includes a higher level of culpability.

[11] Samuel T. Kamaleson, “Mangoes and Marbles,” Decision (January 1978), adapted in Christopher L. Heuertz, Simple Spirituality (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2008), 116-117.