Sunday, February 21, 2021

EXEGESIS OF JOHN 1:1-18

Audio for the following may be found here. You may also listen to podcast episodes here.


Exegesis of John 1:1-18

The Gospel of John possesses a unique perspective on the life and ministry of Christ. Although the book presents a disparate chronological order to the events in Jesus’ life, the primary difference lies more in substantive material. While composed in an abundantly simplistic manner, the spiritual depths held within the book are inarguable. The author of John clearly describes the purpose in composing the book. “…that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name” (John 20:31).[1] John 1:1-18 offers a fundamental support to the material in John’s Gospel. Approached as a prologue, the first eighteen verses promote Jesus as the Word (Logos in Greek) and as human. Furthermore, because of the underlying purpose of John’s Gospel referenced in 20:31, John seems to call the reader to respond to the light of men both throughout the book and in the prologue. The primary thematic material in John’s Gospel is highlighted in the prologue; through the hidden depth underneath the simple compositional style, this prologue grants readers the opportunity to understand the life of Christ in a deeper and more profound manner.

The Word as God (vv. 1-5)

            The Prologue to John’s Gospel resonates strikingly similar to the beginning of the Bible. Both the Genesis and John accounts render the text, “In the beginning…” (Gen 1:1, John 1:1). “Many suggestions have been made that the prologue was originally a poem from some other religious tradition (perhaps gnostic3, though there is no shortage of theories) that John took over and adapted for his own ends (Carson, 1991, p. 112).” Whatever the means employed by the author, John’s Gospel, more than the other Gospel narratives, offers special attention to the deity of Christ. The Word (Logos in Greek), of which John speaks, is God the Son, Jesus Christ. Throughout the narrative, Jesus is submitted as human but also equal to the Father. “I and the Father are one,” (John 10:30) says Jesus. The first five verses of John 1 pungently tie the creation account in Genesis to Jesus who not only dwelt among humankind but, as one with the Father, was present and involved in the creation of the world. John’s Gospel submits, in no uncertain terms, that the Word (Jesus Christ) is, in fact, God himself.

“In the Hebrew scripture, God brings the world into being with a spoken word; in the New Testament, the Word creates all things and takes on flesh to dwell among us” (Kohan, 2019, p. 47). The first five verses of the text here clearly reveal Jesus as one who was both with God and who was God from the beginning (John 1:1). Interpretive difficulties exist in the way of punctuation. Where some take support from early translations and church fathers, others approach the text linguistically; the first group places ὃ γέγονεν with the sentence in verse 4, while the second group places it at the end of verse 3 (Nässelqvist, 2018 p. 176), as is typical in most English versions of the Bible. It might be suggested that the rendering which places the phrase at the beginning of verse 4 presents a more complete view of Jesus’ co-equality and oneness with the Father. To read the text in a manner that suggests nothing was made apart from him and that life was made in him could foster a more complete view of Jesus’ deity and sovereignty, for in such a view, everything comes from Jesus Christ whether life or death, made or unmade; he is the decisive factor in all that exists.

The author begins the text of John 1 focusing on Christ’s deity and position as God by emphasizing his involvement in and superiority over all creation. He then transitions to the hope of the Gospel: new life. With certainty, John’s Gospel references Jesus Christ as the light of men (John 1:4), i.e. the God who created all that exists cares enough about the people whom he created for himself to subsist as their light in an otherwise dark world. Perhaps, John’s emphasis on the deity of Christ and his power over all creation places the proper perspective on his love for people, for in any ordinary situation, it would not be logical for one deemed worthy to love (beyond measure) one who is unworthy.

Moreover, John’s Gospel illustrates the great need of Jesus Christ among humankind. The Son is, in fact, the only existing light in a dark world. He shines as the light and darkness has not overcome him (John 1:5). It seems that the author again links his prologue to the creation account in Genesis, for God created light himself (Gen 1:3). Verse 5 “is a masterpiece of planned ambiguity” (Carson, 1991, p. 119).

If a hellenistic Jew, or for that matter even a pagan Greek, read through the opening verses to this point, and had no personal experience of Christianity, he or she might well take v. 5 to refer exclusively to creation, without moral overtones. Light and darkness are not simply opposites; darkness is nothing other than the absence of light (Carson, 1991, p. 119).

The author proceeds to another level beyond the material world. As if to suggest the spiritual realm beyond what is seen in existence, John’s Gospel presents not only Jesus’ power over creation and, therefore, his divinity but also his role as spiritual light in a dark world. John’s Gospel then connects Jesus’ role as light to his creation of light and superiority over all in existence. Only one who creates light possesses the ability to simultaneously be light. John, therefore, references Christ’s deity in these verses and subsequently points to humankind’s need of him as the only existing light in a morally dark and sinful world.

            John 1:1-18 focuses on the Word, namely Jesus Christ, and, in an unmistakable way, highlights Jesus’ deity, oneness with the Father, and position as creator God. Setting up such a perspective likely aids in declaring Jesus’ subsequent work among people, for to genuinely appreciate the Son’s role as light among humankind and his love toward his people, one must understand the significance of Christ’s deity. John’s Gospel unapologetically emphasizes not only Jesus’ humanity but also his deity.

The Word as Human (vv. 6-13)

            After clearly portraying Jesus’ deity, the second portion of John’s prologue points to the humanity of Jesus. Where some might refer to Jesus as fully God and fully man, “fully” implies volume; yet, Jesus does not possess any volume of deity and humanity, for he is both God and human in his nature. Thus, it would be more accurate to refer to Christ as both truly God and truly man. John’s Gospel indicates the Christ who is both God and human; John 1:6-13 provides the foundation of this concept.

            Verses 6-8 speak of John the Baptist (different from the author of the Gospel of John) as one who bore witness to the light.

The ultimate origins of Jesus Messiah, John will insist, are in the pre-incarnate Word who was with God and who was God. But when he comes to the account of Jesus’ public ministry on the stage of human history, the Evangelist, in common with the Synoptics and with early Christian preaching, begins with the witness of John the Baptist (Carson, 1991, p. 120).

The significance of John the Baptist’s role, in this case, is that he was sent by God as a forerunner to the Messiah.

That he was commissioned by the Almighty places him in the same category as Moses (Ex 3:10–15) and the prophets (e.g. Is 6:8; Je 1:4ff.)—indeed, in this respect, he is like Jesus himself, who was also sent from God (3:17; a frequent theme in the Fourth Gospel (Carson, 1991, p. 120).

Such is perhaps the reason the fourth Gospel necessitates a distinction between the light and the one who bore witness about the light.

            John’s Gospel distinguishes between Christ and John the Baptist briefly and continues with the foundation of the text; the second part of John’s prologue centers around the humanity of Jesus. The author writes, “The true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into the world” (John 1:9). The astonishing idea here is that the one true God of whom the author writes has come into the world as a human. Without bipolarity, John’s Gospel conveys the fact that Jesus provides and, in fact, is the only source of light in an otherwise dark world. A common rabbinic expression, “all who come into the world,” is used to describe every man and is always plural; when speaking of Christ, however, John’s Gospel uses a singular form. An accurate rendering then should be the NIV’s, “The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world;” the Gospel of John repeatedly predicates the idea that Jesus being sent into the world is predicated of him who is the Word (Carson, 1991, p. 121). John’s prologue here then provides the foundation of the entire book: the unbreakable truth that Jesus exists as both God and human to save his people from sin.

            Additionally, in verse 11, John’s Gospel links Jesus to the prophetic truth that he would be rejected by his own people.

Again and again under the old covenant, the prophets describe the recalcitrance of the people of God. ‘All day long I have held out my hands to an obstinate people, who walk in ways not good, pursuing their own imaginations—a people who continually provoke me to my very face’ (Is. 65:2–3), declares the Lord (Carson, 1991, p. 125).

Nonetheless, what is stated in verses 12-13 captures the essence of the entire Gospel: those who receive Christ are given the right of sonship not by lineage of blood but by adoption from God.

When [John] describes those who believe as ‘children’ of God, he uses the word ‘child’ (teknon). He reserves the word ‘son’ (huios) for Jesus himself. In this way he maintains a distinction between Jesus as the ‘Son’ of God, and believers as ‘children’ of God (Kruse, 2003, p. 68).

The premise of John’s text here then is not only the fact that God became human but indeed the purpose for which such incarnation occurred: namely the salvation of humankind. While even the chosen people of God rejected Christ, those who receive him are given the position as children of God by adoption and have been grafted into the family of God (Rom 11:17).

            The deity of Jesus is significant throughout the Gospel of John; yet, the humanity of Jesus is equally as significant. One who created all in existence has become human so that all who receive him might be heirs with him. The prologue here delivers the basis for thematic material throughout the remainder of the book. Jesus Christ, God in flesh, lived as a man so that those who receive him would share with him in eternal life (John 3:16).

Humankind’s Response to the Word (vv. 14-18)

            After John’s discussion of Christ’s deity and humanity, the text necessitates a response from all who gain such knowledge. John reminds the reader that because the Word dwelt among humankind in the flesh, we have beheld God himself (John 1:14, 18). Additionally, in such an act of incarnation, God has provided matchless grace to his people (John 1:16). John’s tender that God himself has been revealed to and indeed dwelt among humankind beckons a response. John’s Gospel ends the prologue with, “…he has made him known” (John 1:18). It is as if the author poses the question of what the reader will do with such a revelation. The Word has dwelt among humankind; therefore, humankind must respond to the Word.

John specifically says that “we have seen his glory” (John 1:14). Of such glory, Colin Kruse writes:

The reference to ‘glory’ is also an allusion to God’s presence in the tabernacle. Exodus 40:34–35 tells us that when Moses completed the construction of the tabernacle, ‘Then the cloud covered the Tent of Meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle. Moses could not enter the Tent of Meeting because the cloud had settled upon it, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle.’ As the glory of God was once present in the tabernacle, so it was now present in the Word made flesh (Kruse, 2003, p. 69).

John the Evangelist’s testimony then would have resonated with his hearers in a tangible way. The glory of God, such an indescribable phenomenon, was given a name and a face in the person of Jesus Christ. As the law was given to Moses, the grace and truth of God came through Jesus Christ (John 1:17). John the Baptist’s testimony bore witness to the Messiah, Jesus Christ. The message he preached then was subject to the truth of Jesus himself, i.e. the Baptist’s message was derived from that of Jesus. John the Evangelist’s focus on the glory of God here summarizes what he has previously shared: 1) Jesus, the Word, is God himself; 2) Jesus is also human; and 3) Jesus is God in human form so that all who receive him might be saved. In essence, the Word is Jesus, Jesus is the Word, and the Word became human to save his people.

Setting the foundation for the remainder of John’s Gospel, an invitation is seemingly given to those who have seen and heard of the Word, Jesus Christ. Understanding that Christ’s work continued with his followers for ages to come, such an invitation still abounds. The author of John seems to place emphasis, however, not on the one who responds but on the one to whom humankind is to respond: Jesus Christ. By clearly pointing to who Jesus is, namely in his deity, John makes clear that it is only appropriate to respond to Christ. He is, in fact, the Logos and the light of men; the prologue of John’s Gospel then offers an invitation to receive that light, which echoes throughout the book.

Limitations to the Text

            Considering the entirety of the Gospel of John, John 1:1-18 should be considered an introduction or a prologue, which certainly reflects the premise of the entire book. In that regard, the first eighteen verses center around Christ’s deity, Christ’s humanity, and humankind’s response to the Son of God. The primary limitations to the text within the scope of this paper are twofold: 1) John’s emphasis on signs and miracles and the necessity to personally behold them and 2) the simplicity of compositional style.

John’s Gospel tends to place great emphasis on seeing the signs and miracles of Christ even suggesting that such is required for belief itself (John 4:48). One must reconcile the necessity for firsthand experience with Jesus’ signs and miracles and those who do not possess the ability to see such miraculous occurrences. One possible reconciliation is the continued incarnate work of Christ after his Ascension. Jesus tells his followers that they would do greater things than he (John 14:12). The Ascension implies that Jesus did not vanish or become a spirit but rather continued to exist in his incarnate state and his work through his followers. After a lengthy account of Jesus’ farewell address, John 18 begins with, “When Jesus had spoken these words…” (John 18:1). “…this…maybe a piece of wit on the part of John the Evangelist or his redactors—a way of saying that even Jesus Christ tended to go on for a bit. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word refused to end. More likely it’s a structural punctuation mark: an exclamation point” (Elie, 2015, p. 14). The need to see Jesus’ signs then could be reconciled by including his continued work by his followers for ages to come.

Another limitation to the text is the simplicity with which the book is composed. In such a simple manner, one might miss or at least underestimate the depth of the Gospel. For that reason, John must be explored with care and scrupulous thought. The first eighteen verses here convey what might be understood in a simple manner, especially to a 1st-century Jewish audience; yet, John brilliantly connects the common thoughts (at the time) of light and the Logos to Jesus Christ. Therefore, the Gospel of John holds spiritual depth beneath the surface of the text. When reading John 1:1-18, one must understand the spiritual depth of the concepts conveyed in relation to the rest of the book. To understand the significance of Christ as the Word or as the light of men, for example, it is not only beneficial but necessary to have in mind the material of the entire book. The seemingly surface-level references hold a spiritual depth that should not be underestimated in the Gospel of John.

Both limitations mentioned here must be considered when analyzing the text. Moreover, one must understand the first eighteen verses in relation to the entire Gospel. Certainly, John 1:1-18 is foundational to the book; thus, one cannot disconnect the prologue from the book but must understand the entirety of the Gospel to truly understand John 1:1-18.

Profound Depth in a Simple Message

            John 1:1-18 serves as a foundational text to support the remainder of the material in the book. The author’s underlying concepts are referenced in the prologue and transport the essence of the Gospel to the reader. John’s emphasis is placed on both the deity and the humanity of Christ. In an inarguable manner, John’s Gospel declares, clearer than the Synoptics, that Jesus is God in flesh and lived among humankind. Additionally, John’s persistent references to Christ as the light of men seem to beckon a response from humankind. John’s Gospel then not only declares the person and deity of Christ by nature but offers hope to a lost and sinful world. Vastly disparate from the Synoptic Gospels not only in chronological order but in substance and material, John’s Gospel unapologetically declares the risen Christ and his divine role on earth and beyond. With profound depth in a simple message, the first eighteen verses of the book provide the foundational roots from which the work of Christ is derived and around which the entire book of John centers: Christ is God; Christ is human; Christ is the light of men; and all three truths demand a response from humankind.

References

Carson, D.A. (1991). The Gospel according to John. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Elie, Paul (2015). The Beginning of the End. Commonweal, Vol. 142 (No. 18), 13-18.

Kohan, John (2019). In the Beginning Was the Word. Christian Century, Vol. 136 (No. 23), 47.

Kruse, Colin G. (2003). John: An Introduction and Commentary (Leon Morris, Ed.). Inter-Varsity Press.

Nässelqvist, Dan (2018). The Question of Punctuation in John 1:3-4: Arguments from Ancient Colometry. Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 137 (No. 1), 175-191.



[1] All biblical references are taken from the English Standard Version (ESV) of the Bible unless otherwise noted.

3 For a prudent assessment of the relation between the Prologue and the Trimorphic Protennoia (the gnostic document to which appeal is currently most frequently made), cf. Craig A. Evans, NTS 27, 1981, pp. 395–401.